|
Post by underage on Nov 4, 2006 10:42:41 GMT -5
The text I have seen that bothers me: "we have already asked members of the legislature to introduce legislation to close whatever loophole might exist if the initiative passes. You can be certain that if the initiative passes, the legislature will immediately pass legislation setting the appropriate penalties for such transfers"
How can we pass things that have known loopholes. If this law is really aimed at adults 21 + there should be no know loopholes. How many loopholes are there that we need to be worried about?
How can we be sure that we will fix these loopholes?
Drinking under 21 has not loopholes, why should marijuana use?
|
|
|
Post by grasshopa on Nov 4, 2006 11:30:02 GMT -5
underage,
What loopholes are you thinking of? I wasn't aware there were any.
Mike
|
|
|
Post by underage on Nov 4, 2006 11:38:42 GMT -5
In the FAQ's. We may have inadvertently created a loophole for transfers to those 18-20
|
|
|
Post by Adam on Nov 4, 2006 15:38:08 GMT -5
there are two exceptions. One, state law makes it a felony to give any amount of marijuana to someone under 15. Two, there is a contributing to the delinquency of a minor statute that makes it illegal to aid anyone under the age of 18 in breaking a state law. Since it would still be illegal for a minor to possess any marijuana if our initiative passes, it would be illegal for an adult to give any amount of marijuana to a minor.
|
|