ken
New Member
Posts: 6
|
Post by ken on Oct 30, 2006 11:46:11 GMT -5
This Sweetin dude keeps talking about how Amendment 44 doesn't do anything to tax and regulate marijuana.
Surely he would support it if it did!
Nevada's initiative will pass, and they still won't be able to tax and regulate it because of Sweetin and his ilk.
|
|
|
|
Post by renomonkey on Oct 30, 2006 11:57:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by renomonkey on Oct 30, 2006 11:58:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by grasshopa on Oct 30, 2006 12:08:01 GMT -5
This Sweetin dude is a fricken moron! Since the gov't is paying so much attention to the site....
READ THIS...
You and your fascist friends will see a change, if not today, then, someday (soon). WE WILL OVER COME!
Having said that, this Sweetin guy is clueless. He, not only, keeps trying to cloud what Mason has to say, but what Mike tries to say as well. I think he needs to learn to compare apples to apples and oranges to oranges. It scares the crap out of me that we put such ignorance in places of power!
As far as Nevada goes I'm being a little (lot) cynical. Based on the numbers I've seen online I don't think it'll pass without the Question 7 organizers pulling a preverbal rabbit out of their collective hat.
Mike
|
|
|
|
Post by grasshopa on Oct 30, 2006 12:10:37 GMT -5
Good point Reno but look at it like this the drug companies AND, by default, the gov't make money off them. That is the difference. There is no other reason they've allowed that to happen.
From what I understand marinol don't come cheap.
Mike
|
|
|
|
Post by jhelion on Oct 30, 2006 12:26:38 GMT -5
Right Grasshoppa - big pharma is very interested in keeping MJ illegal. A good book that discusses the subject is Gatewood Galbraiths autobiography - we need more politicians like him. look at all the pharma sponsors for the the PDFA, or should it be called the "partnership for synthetic drugs only" www.drugfree.org/Portal/About/Partners/list.aspxjay |
|
